But it is time for DHS to focus on the missions and activities that it is uniquely capable of carrying out, and for which it, rather than other agencies, is the natural lead. CAP also recognizes that the safety and services framework proposed will, in many areas, be enabled by the department’s threat management capabilities. In recommending this shift, CAP acknowledges that threats to Americans’ safety and security will continue to require a strong and coordinated response from DHS. While the department will continue its efforts to protect, secure, prevent, and enforce, 4 CAP proposes a strategic shift to a safety and services framework for DHS that would bring the department’s existing responsibilities into balance and realign its priorities around five new core values: connecting, communicating, facilitating, welcoming, and helping. With appropriate oversight and respect for civil liberties, the department has tremendous potential to advance public safety and provide critical services. The Center for American Progress believes that having a Cabinet agency such as DHS remains critical to the safety and well-being of Americans. Public debate over the future of DHS has fallen into two predictable camps: One side calls for the department, or parts of it, to be dismantled, 2 while the other side argues that the solution to DHS’s shortcomings is to hand it even more resources and responsibility. ![]() From analytically based conclusions, it recommends five steps that be taken to bring these fields closer together to benefit more from their synergist relationship as well as from their individual contributions.Despite consensus among policymakers that the department could be far more effective, 1 there is little agreement on how to fix it. It argues that emergency management should be considered a critical subset of the far broader and more strategic field of homeland security. This article demonstrates that the fields of emergency management and homeland security share many responsibilities but are not identical in scope or skills. These conditions can have a deleterious effect on preparedness planning for public and private stakeholders across the nation when coordinated responses among federal, state, and local activities are essential for dealing with consequential hazards. In many ways, homeland security and emergency management have come to represent two different worlds and cultures. Complicating matters further is the fact that neither of these fields has developed agreed definitions. Regrettably, the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the nation's ability to deal with disasters is unnecessarily challenged by the absence of a common understanding on how these fields are related in the workforce and educational arenas. Professionals in the fields of emergency management and homeland security have responsibilities for ensuring that all levels of government, urban areas and communities, nongovernmental organizations, businesses, and individual citizens are prepared to deal with such hazards though actions that reduce risks to lives and property. ![]() In the years after the 9/11 tragedy, the United States continues to face risks from all forms of major disasters, from potentially dangerous terrorist attacks to catastrophic acts of nature.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |